Court States The Case Filing Must Occur Where Defendant Resides - Can This Be Appealed

Court States The Case Filing Must Occur Where Defendant Resides - Can This Be Appealed

Yes, in cases where diversity of citizenship occurs (e.g. Defendant and Plaintiff reside in different states) a lawsuit can be filed in the jurisdiction where the Plaintiff resides or where the claim arose, rather than filing where the Defendant resides, as typically required by the courts.

NOTE: For corporations, federal diversity jurisdiction considers the entity as both a citizen of both the state where it is incorporated and the state where its principal place of business is located. This principal place of business is the location where high-level officers direct, control, and coordinate the corporation's activities, often their headquarters. If the entity is located in a different state (e.g. their state of incorporation state or state of principal business) then the filing can be moved to a court where the Plaintiff resides.
    • Related Articles

    • Can My Chosen Attorney Serve Me In Another State Outside Their BAR License's Jurisdiction

      Yes, asking the courts for an attorney to serve on the trial despite it being outside their jurisdiction is called Pro Hac Vice, which is Latin "for this occasion" or "for this turn". In the legal field, pro hac vice is a practice in common law ...
    • How Does One File A Court Case

      If one has a trust already, one can actually file for FREE by filling out a form called Application for Indigency by the Clerk of Court. By filling out this form with all "zeros" one will automatically qualify for free legal services (except ...
    • Can Anything Bad Happen In Court

      This is not criminal court this is civil court, one cannot go to jail! This is a legal process. One will not get put in handcuffs for standing up for one's legal financial rights. Go to civil court OR small claims court and do it for free by filing ...
    • John Schlabach v USA Claims Lawful Money Redemption is A "Frivolous Argument" and "Indefensible Tax Evasion" - Please Explain

      John Schlabach v USA was a case brought before the Eastern District Court of Washington in 2018. It regarded tax return amendments filed for 2008-2010 tax years in 2013 by Mr. Schlabach to obtain all income withholdings back. He was not approved for ...
    • Criminal Court Bonding

      Statutes are bonds. Courtroom charges are civil, not criminal. Clerk’s Praxis was the court of arches under the king’s bench at the time of Edward I. Everything involves bonds. When one is arrested there are two different sets of bonds. A bid bond is ...